1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 193 N.J.
  5. 193 N.J. Super. 586 (1984)
 

SLOHODA v. UNITED PARCEL SERV., INC.

193 N.J. Super. 586 (1984)

475 A.2d 618

JON SLOHODA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy Erika Smith argued the cause for appellant (Ball, Hayden, Kiernan & Livingston, attorneys).

Howard L. Ganz, member of New York bar, argued the cause for respondents pro hac vice (Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, attorneys; Howard L. Ganz and Edward P. Lynch on the briefs; Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch of counsel).

Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JOELSON, J.A.D.

Plaintiff brought action against United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and several persons in its management personnel. The first count of the six-count complaint alleged that plaintiff had been discharged because of his marital status in violation of N.J.S.A. 10:5-3, N.J.S.A. 10:5-4 and N.J.S.A. 10:5-12 a. Under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12 a, an employer is prohibited from refusing to employ or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases