PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted of possession of a hypodermic syringe in violation of RSA 318:52-e (Supp. 1981). The defendant appeals from the ruling of the Trial Court (Cann, J.) denying his motion to dismiss on the ground that he, and not the State, bears the burden of proof with respect to the statutory exceptions to the prohibitions of RSA 318:52-e (Supp. 1981). We reverse.
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.