1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 599 F.Supp.
  5. 599 F.Supp. 158 (1984)
 

MULL v. ARCO DURETHENE PLASTICS, INC.

No. 80 C 3074.

599 F.Supp. 158 (1984)

E. Kingsley MULL, Plaintiff, v. ARCO DURETHENE PLASTICS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

November 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger L. Price, Philip C. Stahl, Michael A. Kahn, Reuben & Proctor, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Ronald Wilder, Marci Eistenstein, Patricia Dondanville, Schiff, Hardin & Waite, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge:

On January 16, 1980, plaintiff E. Kingsley Mull instituted the present action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 626, alleging that ARCO Polymers, defendant's statutory predecessor, had demoted and forced him into early retirement on account of his age. As discovery progressed, ARCO learned that Mull had been involved in multi-million real estate ventures which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases