SCHULTZ v. TOPAKYAN


193 N.J. Super. 550 (1984)

475 A.2d 91

WAYNE A. SCHULTZ AND KIMBERLY K. SCHULTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HAROLD TOPAKYAN AND BERNICE TOPAKYAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Carmano, Jr. argued the cause for appellants.

Andreas A. Boyadjis argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges KING, DREIER and BILDER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal by prospective purchasers of real property from a summary judgment dismissing their action for specific performance. On June 29, 1983 the parties entered into a contract for the sale of a parcel in Morristown for the sum of $83,500. Included in the contract was a mortgage contingency clause which read as follows:

6. Mortgage Contingency. The Buyer agrees to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases