XEROX CORP. v. HAWKES

No. 83-228.

124 N.H. 610 (1984)

XEROX CORPORATION v. L. ALAN HAWKES d/b/a MIN-A-PRINT

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

March 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay M. Niederman, of Manchester, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Wiggin & Nourie, of Manchester (Eric P. Bernard on the brief and orally), for the defendant.


KING, C.J.

In this case we address the validity of contractual provisions contained in a service agreement between a lessor and a lessee. We hold, first, that the language of the agreement falls within the scope of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code; second, that there is no evidence indicating that the clauses in the agreement which exclude incidental and consequential damages are unconscionable; third, that the agreement's disclaimer language is sufficiently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases