1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 606 F.Supp.
  5. 606 F.Supp. 125 (1984)
 

JAMES v. MEINKE

Civ. A. No. CA 3-83-0719-G.

606 F.Supp. 125 (1984)

Terry JAMES and Juha Kokko, Plaintiffs, v. Raymond H. MEINKE, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

December 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Coyt Randall Johnston, Johnston & Budner, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs.

Hugh O. Mussina, Dallas, Tex., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

Having considered the motions for judgment submitted by both parties and the briefs thereto, the court is of the opinion that plaintiffs' motion should be granted in part and denied in part and that defendant's motion should be denied.

With respect to plaintiffs' claims pursuant to Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S. C.A....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases