1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 586 F.Supp.
  5. 586 F.Supp. 120 (1984)
 

HULSE v. HALE FARMS DEVELOPMENT CORP.

Civ. No. H-83-815 (PCD).

586 F.Supp. 120 (1984)

Charles HULSE, et al. v. HALE FARMS DEVELOPMENT CORP., et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 14, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Nolan, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Thomas C. Marshall, Weber & Marshall, New Britain, Conn., for defendant Robert W. Johnson.

Howard M. Wood, III, Wood & Wood, Glastonbury, Conn., for defendant William E. Chipman.

Michael C. Daly, Furey, Donovan & Heiman, Bristol, Conn., for defendants Hale Farms Development Corp. and Howard Levy.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action seek damages for losses incurred in their purchase of limited partnership interests of Glastonbury Associates, a limited partnership formed and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut. The complaint is framed in two counts. Count I alleges that defendant William Chipman made certain material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale of limited partnership...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases