1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 586 F.Supp.
  5. 586 F.Supp. 118 (1984)
 

DISTRICT 65, UAW v. HARPER & ROW PUBLISHERS

Nos. 82 Civ. 3657 (KTD), 82 Civ. 4042 (KTD).

586 F.Supp. 118 (1984)

DISTRICT 65, UAW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Raymond C. HARWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mittelman & Gordon, Washington, D.C., Eisner & Levy, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs; Eugene Mittelman, Michael S. Gordon, Washington, D.C., Eugene E. Eisner, Richard Levy, New York City, of counsel.

Shea & Gould, New York City, for plaintiff Harwood; Jeffrey D. Mamorsky, Martha Cohen Kurshan, New York City, of counsel.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for defendant Harper & Row; Dennis J. Block, Nancy E. Barton, Bonnie K. Wachtel, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.

In my Opinion and Order dated December 30, 1983, I dismissed plaintiffs' claims asserted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") for breach of fiduciary duty based on the termination of Harper & Row's Retirement Plan and the concomitant reversion of the excess assets to Harper & Row. 576 F.Supp. 1468. Furthermore, I dismissed plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases