IN RE GARBER


95 N.J. 597 (1984)

472 A.2d 566

IN THE MATTER OF HAROLD I. GARBER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 28, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, attorney).

Vincent L. Lamanna, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

Respondent, Harold I. Garber, represented the sole eyewitness to a murder, whose account of the crime had resulted in an indictment for murder against Philip Leonetti. Later, the witness, with the advice of respondent, recanted his identification of Leonetti as the murderer, leading to the dismissal of the indictment. The circumstances surrounding these events gave rise to a presentment against respondent filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases