1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 589 F.Supp.
  5. 589 F.Supp. 78 (1984)
 

STANCIL v. MERGENTHALER LINOTYPE CO.

Civ. No. 82-0023.

589 F.Supp. 78 (1984)

Jack R. STANCIL, Plaintiff, v. MERGENTHALER LINOTYPE COMPANY, A DIVISION OF ELTRA CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

February 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Brower, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff.

Gregory M. Sato, Torkildson, Katz, Jossem & Loden, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FONG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jack R. Stancil was employed by Defendant MERGENTHALER LINOTYPE COMPANY as a salesman for six months when he was terminated due to poor sales as a result of a general decline in business conditions. Plaintiff is suing Defendant in contract for an alleged breach of a "long-term employment agreement" and in tort for misrepresentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases