IN RE HAVERTY

No. 50077-1.

101 Wn.2d 498 (1984)

681 P.2d 835

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of JOHN G. HAVERTY, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 3, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gene M. Grantham, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, J. Robin Hunt, Senior Deputy, Robert Weppner, Special Deputy, and Deborah J. Phillips, Deputy, for respondent.


PEARSON, J.

Petitioner John G. Haverty challenges the constitutionality of jury instructions used in his convictions of burglary and attempted burglary in 1977 and 1975. He claims that the challenged instructions are unconstitutional under Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 61 L.Ed.2d 39, 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979), and that Sandstrom should be applied retroactively to his trials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases