1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 139 Ariz.
  5. 139 Ariz. 433 (1984)
 

COMMERCE REALTY CO. v. MASTICK

No. 17385-PR.

139 Ariz. 433 (1984)

679 P.2d 79

COMMERCE REALTY CO., a sole proprietorship, of George L. Graziadio, in his sole and separate right, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Maria MASTICK, aka Maria Matejchick, a widowed woman; Louis L. Mastick, a married man in his sole and separate right; and Simon Mastick, a married man in his sole and separate right, Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

March 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hecker, Phillips & Hooker by Robert J. Hooker, Tucson, for plaintiff-appellant.

James F. Haythornewhite, Nogales, for defendants-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order made by the court of appeals. The order dismissed an appeal from Superior Court because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

The Petition for Review filed in this court does not comply in any manner with our present rules. See Rule 23, ARCAP, 17A A.R.S. We granted review under the circumstances described and for the purposes explained in Evans v. Arthur, 139 Ariz. 362...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases