1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 10 Ohio
  5. 10 Ohio St. 3d 44 (1984)
 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ZAUDERER

D.D. No. 83-19.

10 Ohio St. 3d 44 (1984)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ZAUDERER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 4, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mr. Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Mr. David K. Frank, for respondent.

Messrs. Gingher & Christensen, Mr. Paul. R. Gingher, Mr. Daniel G. Hale and Mr. Malcolm L. Miller, for amicus curiae, Ohio Newspaper Association.

Messrs. Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Mr. John W. Zeiger and Mr. Todd S. Swatsler, for amicus curiae, Dispatch Printing Company.

Messrs. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Ms. Lita C. Miller, for amicus curiae, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Ohio, Inc.

CLIFFORD F. BROWN, J.

This is a case of first impression in Ohio concerning the constitutional validity of Disciplinary Rules which restrict the content of legal service advertisements. Specifically, the question presented herein is whether the content restrictions of DR 2-101(B)2 violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 11, Article I of the Ohio Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases