1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 200 N.J.
  5. 200 N.J. Super. 333 (1984)
 

SOBOTOR v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. INS. CO.

200 N.J. Super. 333 (1984)

491 A.2d 737

BERNARD SOBOTOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND CHARLES REDMOND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Lenney argued the cause for appellants (Enright, Porter, Lenney & McGrath, attorneys; William L. Bracaglia on the brief).

Richard Wildstein argued the cause for respondent (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys; David Joshua Michelson on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, FURMAN and COHEN.

PER CURIAM.

In October 1980, plaintiff, who had recently moved to New Jersey from New York, contacted defendant Prudential Insurance Company in order to obtain automobile insurance. He was referred to insurance agent defendant Charles Redmond, with whom he subsequently met to discuss coverage. In response to Redmond's inquiry, plaintiff informed Redmond of the coverage and monetary limits provided by his policy in New York. Redmond advised plaintiff that he was required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases