1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 431 (1984)
 

MATTER OF FELMEISTER

95 N.J. 431 (1984)

471 A.2d 775

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. FELMEISTER AND HANAN M. ISAACS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Rubenstein argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Counsel, attorney).

David B. Rubin argued the cause for respondents (Rubin & Rubin, attorneys; Robert A. Felmeister and Hanan M. Isaacs, pro se, on the briefs).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding comes before us on respondents' motion to dismiss the charges on the ground that the Disciplinary Rule barring broadcast advertising, DR 2-101(D), is unconstitutional. Respondents concede that they intentionally violated DR 2-101(D) by radio advertisements, though fully cognizant that at that time we were reviewing the Rule and considering amendments to it....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases