1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 142 Ariz.
  5. 142 Ariz. 375 (1984)
 

STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF PIMA

No. 2 CA-SA 088.

142 Ariz. 375 (1984)

690 P.2d 94

The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the state of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA, and the Honorable William Scholl, Judge Pro Tempore of the Superior Court, Respondent, and Jude J. GEIST, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Review Denied November 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by William F. Mills, Tucson, for petitioner.

Frederic J. Dardis, Pima County Public Defender by Jeffrey Schwartz, Tucson, for real party in interest.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The state has brought this special action from the trial court's denial of its motion to preclude post-hypnotic testimony by the real party in interest, an order precluding any testimony with regard to hypnosis, and the denial of the state's request for a continuance of the trial to allow for an interview of the hypnotist involved. Additionally, the state also seeks special action relief from an order issued by the respondent court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases