1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 194 N.J.
  5. 194 N.J. Super. 320 (1984)
 

BURDGE v. EXCELSIOR INS. CO.

194 N.J. Super. 320 (1984)

476 A.2d 880

E. KENNETH BURDGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EXCELSIOR INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Pollinger argued the cause for appellant (DeLorenzo & Pollinger, attorneys; William J. Pollinger, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael G. McNamara argued the cause for respondent (Francis P. Piscal, attorney; Michael G. McNamara, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

The question raised by this appeal is whether campaign activities engaged in by a public office-holder seeking re-election are within the scope of the typical business-pursuits exclusion of a liability policy. We affirm the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court, Law Division, holding that this policy exclusion does not apply to reelection campaign activities.

In September 1980 plaintiff E...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases