1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 194 N.J.
  5. 194 N.J. Super. 307 (1984)
 

STROMAN v. BROWN

194 N.J. Super. 307 (1984)

476 A.2d 874

LEROY STROMAN AND MATTIE STROMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARGUERITE C. BROWN AND WILLIAM D. BROWN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Pinto argued the cause for appellants (Polino and Williams, attorneys; Joseph M. Pinto on the brief).

Daniel J. Saul argued the cause for respondents (Frank J. Ferry, attorney; Daniel J. Saul on the brief).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

Defendant William Brown (William) allowed his wife defendant Marguerite Brown (Marguerite) to take his automobile from their home in New Jersey and drive it to Pennsylvania for her own purposes. Plaintiff Larry Stroman claims he was injured in an accident Marguerite had with the automobile while she was in Pennsylvania. Stroman and his wife sued defendants in Pennsylvania where they recovered a judgment by default...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases