1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 139 Ariz.
  5. 139 Ariz. 343 (1984)
 

PULLIAM v. PULLIAM

No. 2 CA-CIV 4871.

139 Ariz. 343 (1984)

678 P.2d 528

Emily PULLIAM, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jack PULLIAM, Respondent/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

February 23, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton L. Liechty, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant.

Lieberthal & Kashman, P.C. by Howard A. Kashman, Tucson, for respondent/appellee.

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.

The only issue involved in this appeal is the custody provision in the dissolution decree. The trial court found that it was in the best interests of the two children, ages one and five, that the appellee father be given their custody. Substantial evidence supports this decision and we will not disturb it on appeal. Not only do we find no abuse of discretion, the totality of the evidence supports the award. See Ward v. Ward...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases