1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 380 (1984)
 

BAUMANN v. MARINARO

95 N.J. 380 (1984)

471 A.2d 395

RENEE A. BAUMANN AND CLAUDE P. BAUMANN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. KIMBERLY M. MARINARO AND NICHOLAS A. MARINARO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas S. Brierley argued the cause for appellants (Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys; Harold A. Price and Edward W. Ahart, of counsel).

Donald L. Minassian argued the cause for respondents (Draesel, Sunshine & Atkins, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal involves the interrelationship between post-trial motions made pursuant to R. 4:49-1, R. 4:49-2 and R. 4:50-1. Specifically, the issues presented are: (1) May the time to file a motion for a new trial under R. 4:49-1 be extended under extenuating circumstances; (2) Does a motion to alter and amend judgment under R. 4:49-2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases