1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 143 Ariz.
  5. 143 Ariz. 314 (1984)
 

STATE v. DRUKE

No. 2 CA-SA 0134.

143 Ariz. 314 (1984)

693 P.2d 969

The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. The Honorable William DRUKE, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the County of Pima, Respondent, and Ronald Dwight SCHACKERT, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Review Denied January 15, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Richard D. Nichols, Tucson, for petitioner.

Frederic J. Dardis, Pima County Public Defender by Karen Noble and Donald S. Klein, Tucson, for real party in interest.

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.

This special action was taken from the order of the respondent court denying the state/petitioner's motion to appoint a mental health expert to examine the defendant/real party in interest pursuant to Rule 11.2, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. and A.R.S. § 13-3993. We accept jurisdiction because the question presented is a matter of first impression in this state and is of statewide importance, and because the petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases