1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 143 Ariz.
  5. 143 Ariz. 287 (1984)
 

EDSALL v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA

No. 2 CA-SA 0032.

143 Ariz. 287 (1984)

693 P.2d 942

Phillip V. EDSALL, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA; Hon. Norman S. Fenton, a judge thereof, and Ruth E. EDSALL, the real party in interest, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

March 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell & Hanshaw, P.C. by W. Patrick Traynor, Tucson, for petitioner.

Whitehill, Stolkin, Karp, West, Weiss & Berger, P.C. by Leonard Karp, Tucson, for respondents.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Petitioner has brought this special action to challenge the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss part of a petition for an order to show cause relating to the disposition of military retirement benefits. We believe the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction and, because of the statewide interest in the effect of recent federal legislation, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

Petitioner Philip Edsall and respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases