1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 195 N.J.
  5. 195 N.J. Super. 209 (1984)
 

RAVEN v. A. KLEIN & CO., INC.

195 N.J. Super. 209 (1984)

478 A.2d 1208

SAMUEL RAVEN, ARTHUR ROSENFIELD, MORRIS SCHMELL AND S.A.M., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. A. KLEIN & CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Holahan argued the cause for appellant (Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Coyle & McBride, attorneys; and Theodore J. Greene, pro hac vice, of the New York Bar, Frank Holahan and Theodore J. Greene, on the brief).

George S. Hochberg argued the cause for respondents (Hockberg & Simon, attorneys; Richard I. Simon, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, DREIER and BILDER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendant has appealed from a Chancery Division judgment limiting the enforcement of restrictive covenants in plaintiffs Raven's and Schmell's employment agreements. These agreements provided trade secret protection "during or after the course of employment," and provided further for noncompetition with defendant "for a period of ten years." Plaintiffs have cross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases