1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 280 (1984)
 

BROWN v. RACQUET CLUB OF BRICKTOWN

95 N.J. 280 (1984)

471 A.2d 25

JERILYN BROWN AND JACK BROWN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. RACQUET CLUB OF BRICKTOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND KEN WILSON, T/A HANICORT, INC., AND/OR WILSON CONSTRUCTION, A. HARRY LANG, MORGAN DAVIS, A.I.A., DEFENDANTS. MARGARET PISCAL AND FRANCIS P. PISCAL, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. RACQUET CLUB OF BRICKTOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 14, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen G. Sweet argued the cause for appellant (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys).

Robert F. Novins argued the cause for respondents Margaret Piscal, et al. (Novins, Farley, Grossman & York, attorneys; James P. Brady and Lorna S. Scanlon, on the briefs).

Robert M. Adochio argued the cause for respondents Jerilyn Brown, et al. (Hendricks & Adochio, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

The Ocean Tennis Association, a non-profit group of tennis players, conducted a social function at premises consisting of a clubhouse building and adjacent tennis courts owned and operated by defendant, Racquet Club of Bricktown. The social event was a fashion show and buffet luncheon held on the second floor of the clubhouse building. Defendant's premises were made available for such functions in order to familiarize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases