1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 6 N.J.
  5. 6 N.J. Tax 351 (1984)
 

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC. v. FORT LEE BOR.

6 N.J. Tax 351 (1984)

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for appellant (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe of counsel and on the brief).

Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent (Melvin Gittleman, attorney; Steven Muhlstock on the brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Tax court, substantially for the reasons given by John J. Hopkins, J.T.C. in his opinion in this matter published in 4 N.J.Tax 30 (1981). We add that by reason of the stipulation entered into by plaintiff at the pretrial conference we conceive no reason for a remand.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases