1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 324 S.E.2d
  5. 324 S.E.2d 1 (1984)
 

BARRUS CONST. CO. v. N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. 8411SC195.

324 S.E.2d 1 (1984)

BARRUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A DIVISION OF APAC-CAROLINA, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White, Allen, Hooten, & Hodges, P.A. by John C. Archie, Kinston, for plaintiff.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Thomas H. Davis, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant.

WELLS, Judge.

We address first the DOT's cross assignment of error that service of process was not timely and that the court erred in denying its motion to dismiss. The state has consented to suit on highway contract claims. N.C.Gen.Stat. § 136-29 (1981 and Cum.Supp.1983). Such a suit is timely filed if instituted by filing of complaint and issuance of summons within six months after the final decision of the State Highway Administrator denying the claim.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases