IN RE REINSTATEMENT OF STINCHFIELD

D.D. No. 80-19.

15 Ohio St. 3d 17 (1984)

IN RE PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF STINCHFIELD.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 19, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas A. Schaffer, for petitioner.

Messrs. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Mr. Robert P. Bartlett, Jr., and Mr. Chester E. Finn, for Dayton Bar Association.


Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of the matter, this court finds that petitioner possesses the necessary qualifications for readmission to the practice of law in Ohio. Petitioner's prior difficulties which resulted in his suspension were the result of his physical difficulties rather than any active misconduct. Petitioner's conscientious efforts to maintain his legal expertise have convinced this court that he possesses the mental, educational and moral qualifications...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases