PER CURIAM.
The conduct of attorney Charles T. Corn in this case is similar to that in the preceding case (In the matter of Corn, Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 317). In this case, after Corn accepted a retainer to file a contempt action, his clients attempted unsuccessfully to contact him by telephone for two weeks. When the clients finally were able to contact Corn, he assured them that the contempt action had been filed; it had not. Upon being discharged...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.