1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 11 Ohio
  5. 11 Ohio St. 3d 214 (1984)
 

STATE EX REL. STRAUSS v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY

No. 83-810.

11 Ohio St. 3d 214 (1984)

THE STATE, EX REL. STRAUSS, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Willacy & LoPresti, Mr. Aubrey B. Willacy, Mr. Timothy A. Marcovy, Messrs. Weiner, Orkin, Abbate & Suit and Mr. Louis H. Orkin, for appellants.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Thomas P. Gill and Mr. Patrick Carroll, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

This court has consistently held that mandamus will not lie where there is an adequate remedy at law. Appellants do not contest their right to appeal the judgment of the trial court. However, State, ex rel. Sowell, v. Lovinger (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 21, is cited for the proposition that where there is a total want of jurisdiction mandamus will lie regardless of the existence of an adequate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases