1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 126 (1984)
 

MATTER OF NICHOLS

95 N.J. 126 (1984)

469 A.2d 494

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES D. NICHOLS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 10, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Counsel, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Francis X. Crahay, argued the cause for respondent (Giordano, Halleran & Crahay, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arose as a result of a presentment filed by the District VIII Ethics Committee (Committee) against respondent, a member of the bar, charging him with violations of DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving deceit and misrepresentation) and DR 5-104 (engaging in improper conduct in a business transaction with a client). After a hearing, the Disciplinary Review Board (Board) accepted the Committee's finding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases