1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 580 F.Supp.
  5. 580 F.Supp. 1543 (1984)
 

PIERCE v. NEW PROCESS CO.

Civ. A. No. 83-223 ERIE.

580 F.Supp. 1543 (1984)

John A. PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. NEW PROCESS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

March 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger H. Taft, J. Douglas Murphy, MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton, Erie, Pa., for plaintiff.

Donald Wright, Knox, Graham, McLaughlin, Gornall & Sennett, Erie, Pa., Michael R. Zeller, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment in this age discrimination case. The parties have submitted extensive evidentiary materials, including depositions and affidavits of parties and witnesses, which present all facts provable at trial. For the reasons stated below, we must grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant on all claims.

I. FACTS

The undisputed facts of record may be summarized as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases