GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE v. TRANTOLO

(10775)

192 Conn. 15 (1984)

GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE HARTFORD-NEW BRITAIN JUDICIAL DISTRICT v. JOSEPH J. TRANTOLO, JR., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released January 3, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxwell Heiman, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Tracy, Jr., for the appellants (defendants).

Arnold M. Schwolsky, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Philip R. Dunn, grievance committee counsel, and, on the brief, John M. Bailey, state's attorney, for the appellee (plaintiff).

SPEZIALE, C. J., PETERS, PARSKEY, GRILLO and MENT, Js.


SPEZIALE, C. J.

The defendants, Joseph Trantolo and Vincent Trantolo, are members of the bar authorized to practice law in the state of Connecticut. They have appealed from the trial court's judgment reprimanding them for violating Disciplinary Rule 2-101 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (hereinafter DR 2-101). Because we hold that the defendants' actions are not prohibited by the Code of Professional Responsibility, we find error.

The defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases