CHRISTENSEN v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

No. 82-AB-1769; CA A26352.

673 P.2d 1379 (1984)

66 Or.App. 309

Milo Wayne CHRISTENSEN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and Bingham-Willamette Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo Wayne Christensen, filed the brief pro se for petitioner.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Div.

No appearance for respondent Bingham-Willamette Co.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

The issue in this unemployment benefit appeal is whether there is substantial evidence in the record that claimant's drinking was in wilful disregard of his employer's best interests. The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) found that there was. We are unable to find any evidence supporting EAB's determination and reverse.

Claimant is a chronic alcoholic who appears from the record to have significant periods of sobriety followed by relapses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases