1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 592 F.Supp.
  5. 592 F.Supp. 1437 (1984)
 

MAX M. v. THOMPSON

No. 82 C 6575.

592 F.Supp. 1437 (1984)

MAX M., and his parents, Mr. & Mrs. M., Plaintiffs, v. James R. THOMPSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew D. Cohen, Canel, Aronson & Whitted, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Ralph Miller, John Collins, Brydges, Riseborough, Morris, Franke & Miller, Paul Millichap, Asst. Attys. Gen., State of Ill., John A. Relias, M. Morrison Torrey, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This order concerns the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, both motions are denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs' initial complaint stated claims which, although based on various federal and state statutory and constitutional provisions, were primarily derived from the Education for All Handicapped Children Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases