MATLOCK v. ROSE

No. 81-5414.

731 F.2d 1236 (1984)

Lester MATLOCK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROSE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Farmer, Federal Public Defender, Nashville, Tenn., Donald E. Dawson, Asst. Federal Public Defender (argued), Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner-appellant.

William M. Leech, Jr., Atty. Gen., Ann Lacy Johns, Wayne Uhl (argued), Asst. Attys. Gen., Nashville, Tenn., for respondent-appellee.

Before KEITH and JONES, Circuit Judges, and JOINER, District Judge.


NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Lester Matlock, petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), seeks reversal of an order denying habeas corpus relief. Matlock's pro se habeas petition claimed that the state trial court violated the Constitution by (1) not granting a request for a full physical and neurological examination when his only defense was that of insanity, (2) limiting the scope of his expert's testimony, and (3) failing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases