1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 589 F.Supp.
  5. 589 F.Supp. 1268 (1984)
 

STATE TEACHERS RET. BD. v. FLUOR CORP.

No. 76 Civ. 2135 (RWS).

589 F.Supp. 1268 (1984)

STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLUOR CORPORATION and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz, Shapiro, Kelm & Warren, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs; Russell A. Kelm, Columbus, Ohio, of counsel.

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York City, for defendant Fluor Corp.; Raymond L. Falls, New York City, of counsel.

Kelley, Drye & Warren, New York City, for defendant Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co.; Richard J. Concannon, Robert E. Crotty, Kevin J. Walsh, Michael M. Horowitz, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company ("MHT") has moved under Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., to amend its answer to assert a cross-claim for contribution against defendant Fluor Corporation ("Fluor"). MHT has also moved for an order limiting proof regarding MHT's trading in Fluor stock to the period ending March 6, 1975, and for orders excluding certain evidence from trial. Plaintiffs, State Teachers Retirement Board, individually...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases