-link">Featured Decisions
  • Latest Decisions
  • Browse Decisions
  • Advanced Search
  • Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
    Sign in
     

    MISHTAKU v. ESPADA

    No. 15-2265.

    MARTIN MISHTAKU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OFFICER CINDY ESPADA, SERGEANT ANTHONY ESPOSITO, DEPUTY INSPECTOR ANDREW LUNETTA, DIRECTOR THOMAS M. PRASSO, POLICE DEPARTMENT LICENSE DIVISION, CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants-Appellees.

    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

    September 28, 2016.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    MARTIN MISHTAKU, pro se, Flushing, NY., for Plaintiff-Appellant.

    ELIZABETH I. FREEDMAN, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY., for Defendants-Appellees.

    PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges, JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.


    SUMMARY ORDER

    RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases

      GARPEG, LTD. v. UNITED ST | 588 F.Supp... | pp124011681 | Leagle.com
       

      GARPEG, LTD. v. UNITED STATES

      No. 84 Civ. 0437 (RWS).

      588 F.Supp. 1240 (1984)

      GARPEG, LIMITED, Petitioner, and Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

      United States District Court, S.D. New York.

      July 10, 1984.


      Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

      Gallop, Dawson, Kimelman & Clayman, New York City, for petitioner; Steven Kimelman, Charles E. Clayman, Chris McAliley, New York City, of counsel.

      Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for intervenor; Andrew Connick, New York City, of counsel.

      Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City, for respondent; Jonathan Lindsey, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.


      OPINION

      SWEET, District Judge.

      This is one of several actions arising out of an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") investigation of Dr. Aldo Gucci ("Gucci") and Gucci Shops, Inc. ("Gucci Shops") for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981.1 On December 29, 1983, the IRS served upon The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase") an administrative summons requesting production on January 30, 1984 of records relating to accounts maintained by Garpeg...

      Let's get started

      Leagle.com

      Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
      Sign on now to see your case.
      Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

      • Updated daily.
      • Uncompromising quality.
      • Complete, Accurate, Current.

      Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

      Cited Cases

      • No Cases Found

      Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

      Citing Cases