1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 578 F.Supp.
  5. 578 F.Supp. 1209 (1984)
 

SKADEGAARD v. FARRELL

Civ. A. No. 83-945.

578 F.Supp. 1209 (1984)

Rashmi C. SKADEGAARD, Plaintiff, v. Thomas D. FARRELL, Philip H. Witt, Howard Silverman and Ira Mintz, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 19, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Mullin, Mullin & Casteleiro, Hoboken, N.J., for plaintiff.

Howard Davis, Sobel & Lyon, East Hanover, N.J., for defendant Witt.

Bruce McMoran, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, Somerville, N.J., for defendant Mintz.

Robert B. Reed, Milford, N.J., for defendant Farrell.

Roger Jacobs, Green & Dzwilewski, P.A., East Orange, N.J., for defendant Silverman.

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

This is an action arising out of the alleged sexual harassment of plaintiff, Rashmi Skadegaard, who, after allegedly rebuffing her supervisor's advances, claims she was the subject of a retaliatory conspiracy perpetrated by the defendants to this lawsuit. Plaintiff was, for a period of approximately two years, the first and only female staff Clinical Psychologist to be hired by her employer, the Adult Diagnostic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases