1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 588 F.Supp.
  5. 588 F.Supp. 1158 (1984)
 

HADDAD v. RICHARDSON-MERRELL, INC.

No. C80-1722.

588 F.Supp. 1158 (1984)

Paul HADDAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RICHARDSON-MERRELL, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

June 14, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Raynes, Alan Herman, Raynes, McCarty, Binder, Ross & Mundy, Philadelphia, Pa., Donald P. Traci, Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci & Lancione, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Peter Perretti, Benjamin Michel, Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Hyland, Morristown, N.J., R. Crawford Morris, Susan Raabe, Arter & Haddens, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant's renewed motion for dismissal of the action on the grounds of forum non conveniens. The Court previously denied defendant's motion for dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds, Lake v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 538 F.Supp. 262 (N.D. Ohio 1982), and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases