1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 584 F.Supp.
  5. 584 F.Supp. 1134 (1984)
 

UNITED STATES v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO.

Civ. No. 83-51-D.

584 F.Supp. 1134 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and Nabisco Brands, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, C.D.

April 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth L. Jost, Bruce K. Yamanaga, Rosemary E. Glynn, Scot B. Hutchins, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

J. Randolph Wilson, Theodore Voorhees, Washington, D.C., Lance A. Coppock, Des Moines, Iowa, Owen M. Johnson, Jr., Washington, D.C., Mark Schantz, Des Moines, Iowa, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION, RULINGS AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

VIETOR, District Judge.

The government's complaint alleges that defendants violated section I of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.

In respect to the Clayton Act claim the defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and the government has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The motions raise the issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases