1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 689 P.2d
  5. 689 P.2d 1023 (1984)
 

STATE v. WHITFORD

10-83-02624; CA A30628

689 P.2d 1023 (1984)

70 Or.App. 456

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Roger Walter WHITFORD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Brenda J. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for failure to appear in the first degree, ORS 162.205, contending that the charging statute is unconstitutionally vague.1 Because his behavior was unquestionably within the prohibited conduct of the statute, we hold that defendant is precluded from challenging the constitutionality of the statute, as applied to him, on vagueness grounds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases