1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 750 F.2d
  5. 750 F.2d 952 (1984)
 

LITTON SYSTEMS, INC. v. SUNDSTRAND CORP.

Appeal No. 84-1356.

750 F.2d 952 (1984)

LITTON SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp., et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 19, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick A. Lorig, Kendrick, Netter & Bennett, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Elwood S. Kendrick, Los Angeles, Cal., and Allen M. Sokal, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C.

Gregory A. Long, Overton, Lyman & Prince, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellees. With him on the brief were Walther E. Wyss, Mason, Kolehmainen, Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, Ill., Richard J. Hoskins, Schiff, Hardin & Waite, Chicago, Ill., was also on brief.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California denying Litton Systems' (Litton's) motion for preliminary injunction. We affirm.

Background

Litton makes and sells, as do others, a ring laser gyroscope (RLG), formed normally of a thermally and mechanically stable block of quartz ceramic material. Counter-rotating laser beams are generated in a cavity in the block and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases