1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 592 F.Supp.
  5. 592 F.Supp. 1108 (1984)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

592 F.Supp. 1108 (1984)

R. Stockton RUSH III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 23, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lovell & Stewart, New York City, for plaintiff.

Joan Caridi, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

R. Stockton Rush III ("Rush") commenced this action against Oppenheimer and Co. and Scott Seskis ("defendants") in order to seek the recovery of damages for alleged violations of the federal securities laws (Count One), violations of common law principles of fraud and fiduciary duty (Count Two), and the Federal Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Count Three). Defendants moved for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases