1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 583 F.Supp.
  5. 583 F.Supp. 1060 (1984)
 

WILSMANN v. UPJOHN CO.

No. K77-317 CA

583 F.Supp. 1060 (1984)

Edward J. WILSMANN, Plaintiff, v. UPJOHN COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.

April 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon C. Miller, Richard C. Walsh, Walsh, Miller, Rayman & Langeland, Kalamazoo, Mich., for plaintiff.

Thomas G. Parachini, Dirk Holkeboer, Brown, Colman & Dement, Kalamazoo, Mich., Charles Lister, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

This matter was tried to a jury over ten trial days. At the close of the proofs, and after due deliberation, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,578,107.00. Now before the Court is defendants' motion, pursuant to Rules 50 and 59, Fed.R.Civ.P., for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial. For the reasons set out below, the motion is denied.

The legal standards to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases