1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 587 F.Supp.
  5. 587 F.Supp. 896 (1984)
 

SAUNDERS v. AMERITRUST OF CINCINNATI

No. C-1-83-1548.

587 F.Supp. 896 (1984)

Michael SAUNDERS, Plaintiff, v. AMERITRUST OF CINCINNATI, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

June 14, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Rothstein, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

John W. Hust, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter came on for consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment: defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. 13), plaintiff's memorandum in opposition and cross-motion (doc. 16), and defendant's reply (doc. 18). For reasons that follow, we find that 15 U.S.C. §§ 1637(b), 1666(b)(6), and 1666a, all of which are included in the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases