1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 580 F.Supp.
  5. 580 F.Supp. 773 (1984)
 

HAGSTROM v. BREUTMAN

No. 83 C 0476.

580 F.Supp. 773 (1984)

William HAGSTROM, Victor Berger, Edwin Falloon and Eduardo Nijensohn, Plaintiffs, v. Martin E. BREUTMAN, Meb Investments, Ltd., and Beverly Associates, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

February 23, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Adamski, Michael J. Weik, Carponelli, Krug, Adamski & Goodstein, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Dennis A. Bell, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

In something less than a subtle attempt to avoid our previous order remanding this action to arbitration, plaintiffs now move for leave to file an amended complaint and to vacate the October 3, 1983 order staying these proceedings pending arbitration. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we deny plaintiffs' motion to file their amended count X, alleging excessive trading and churning, we grant plaintiffs' motion to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases