MLEYNEK v. HEADQUARTERS COMPANIES

Docket No. G001894.

165 Cal.App.3d 1133 (1984)

209 Cal. Rptr. 593

DARRYL MLEYNEK et al., Defendants and Appellants, v. HEADQUARTERS COMPANIES, Plaintiff and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 19, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Timothy H. Fine, Patrick J. Carter, Garry Koenigsberg and Robert L. Gorman for Defendants and Appellants.

Kadison, Pfaelzer, Woodard, Quinn & Rossi, Paul B. George, Kevin E. Monson, Brownstein, Zeidman & Schomer and David J. Butler for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

WALLIN, Acting P.J.

Darryl and Sherryl Mleynek appeal the denial of their petition to compel arbitration of an unlawful detainer action. They argue the arbitration provision in a related franchise agreement compels arbitration of the unlawful detainer dispute.

Facts

In July 1979, Darryl and Sherryl Mleynek entered into a franchise agreement with Headquarters Companies (HQ) to operate a "HQ Center"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases