1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 603 F.Supp.
  5. 603 F.Supp. 677 (1984)
 

MIZLOU TELEVISION NETWORK v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING

No. 84-1613.

603 F.Supp. 677 (1984)

MIZLOU TELEVISION NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Hartke, Vance Hartke, Hartke & Hartke, Falls Church, Va., for plaintiff.

Hugh P. Morrisson, Jr., Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, Washington, D.C., for defendants NBC, Arthur Watson and Jeff Cokin.

Donald Zeifang, Baker & Hostetler, Washington, D.C., for defendants Fla. Citrus Sports Ass'n, Sam Hines, Charles Rohe, Vernon Hinely & Fla. Citrus Com'n.

J. Hardin Peterson, Jr., Peterson, Myers, Craig, Crews, Brandon & Mann, P.A., Lakeland, Fla., pro hac vice per Ct. order for Fla. Citrus Com'n.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

This action involves a dispute over rights to televise the 1984 Florida Citrus Bowl (formerly the Tangerine Bowl), a college football game to be played on December 22 of this year. Plaintiff Mizlou Television Network, Inc. ("Mizlou") raises various federal antitrust and pendent state law claims in connection with the decision of defendant Florida Citrus Sports Association to grant the broadcast...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases