TABLE OF CONTENTS I.Introduction ..................................... 693 A. Federal law—for jurisdictional purposes; for substantive purposes; for evidentiary and procedural purposes; and as a model for the states to incorporate in their own law ................................. 694 B. State law ..................................... 695...
Let's get started
![]()
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
IN RE "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
580 F.Supp. 690 (1984)
In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION.
United States District Court, E.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 21, 1984.
February 21, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Leonard Rivkin, Rivkin, Leff, Sherman & Radler, Garden City, N.Y., Philip Pakula, Townley & Updike, Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, William Krohley, Kelley, Drye & Warren, Thomas Beck, Arthur, Dry & Kalish, Richard Goldstein, Shea & Gould, New York City of counsel, David R. Gross, Budd, Larner, Kent, Gross, Picillo & Rosenbaum, New York City, Paul V. Esposito, Lewis, Overbeck & Furman, Chicago, Ill., Morton B. Silberman, Clark, Gagliardi & Miller, White Plains, N.Y., for defendants.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.