1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 587 F.Supp.
  5. 587 F.Supp. 658 (1984)
 

FREEDMAN v. MELDY'S, INC.

Civ. A. No. 83-5992.

587 F.Supp. 658 (1984)

Gary FREEDMAN v. MELDY'S, INC. and Richard Meldofsky.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Higgins, Post & Schell, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Stephen G. Fox, Barry D. Floyd, Bernstein & Fox, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.

The complaint in this action has its genesis in an exclusive franchise agreement entered into between plaintiff and defendant, Meldy's, Inc. Plaintiff seeks to recover losses sustained in the operation of a franchised restaurant, which enterprise he allegedly entered into as a result of certain misrepresentations made by defendants. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases